ITALY
QUITO
THAILAND

While the crew enjoys one final Vietnamese adventure on Phu Quoc island Dan packs his bags and says goodbye to Jet Set Zero.

Aaaaaand we’re back, after a lengthy interlude.  Upon completing Episode 7 I needed a little time to recover emotionally: too much of Rob’s struggle was a reflection of the events of my own life and the combined toll of that, a number of family health problems, the holiday season, and my trip to Tokyo delayed the airing of this episode by two weeks.  I apologize for the delay; we’re going to try to pick up the pace to make up for lost time.

It was sad to see Dan go (I personally knew him from college in New York), but I understand his predicament and I think he made the right choice in the end.  For a few weeks in Season 2 you’ll be seeing me stand in as a replacement, but we’re looking for a full time cast addition so keep those applications rolling!

Comments

There are no comments for this post.

  1. Travel Fiend on January 6, 2009 4:55 pm

    Hey guys, great episode!

    It’s tough to see Dan go; he has definitely brought balance and a different perspective to bear these past weeks and months. As much as I like this last episode, I must say that I wholly disagree with Dan’s take on what was referred to as “neo-colonialism.” I do not have experience teaching English abroad, although I have traveled to countries much less developed than the western world and seen situations that appear to resemble Vietnam rather closely.

  2. Travel Fiend on January 6, 2009 5:19 pm

    (continued from previous comment.)

    I see no reason why anyone who was brought up speaking English should feel any guilt as a result. Speaking English in today’s world is a desirable skill. Clearly, there must be significant demand for English teachers if wages are as high as they appear to be. As a corollary, Vietnamese students (or their sponsors, be that family or government) would not pay significant amounts of money for English language lessons if they did not believe themselves to be gaining equivalent value in return.

    Not every country is as developed as America, or the western world in general; this is simply the state of affairs of our world today. I fail to see how going abroad, living in a less developed country, and teaching English to willing, paying students could in any way be interpreted as exploitative. I know and have met a number of people who were born in Vietnam (or whose parents were) and who came to America seeking a better life. I’ll go way out on a limb here and say that an American citizen (even in modern Obamunist America) is waaaaay freer than their counterpart in communist Vietnam. Teaching Vietnamese kids English seems like a great opportunity to me: good pay for the teacher in exchange for the transference of valuable skills to the consumer.

    Think about the alternative. If the four of you had not gone to Vietnam at all, would your students have been any better off? Of course not. They gained immense value from their interactions with you, as they will from other English teachers (assuming they are able to find/afford other teachers).

    I commend you guys for the time you spend teaching English in Vietnam, just think about how you helped to open the world, even if just a bit, to whole classrooms and conference rooms of Vietnamese kids and businesspeople. Think also about how your experience of the world was broadened by many a cheerful 100%!

    I guess ultimately I am curious how Dan came to the conclusions he did and if anyone feels differently about what it means to teach English abroad, especially in a communist country.

    Cheers,
    –Travel Fiend

Write a Comment